writers study the human mind

What a coincidence, Mishima was born on 14 January, 1925. I’m halfway through Decay of an Angel, after which I intend to get Sun and Steel. I think my fascination with confessional writing is that such writers are not abashed to reveal their ugliness. They pick at their sores and analyze it and show it off. I think a great writer offers a glimpse into how the human mind works. I think it would be great to be able to see through people, what they actually mean behind every word they say, like that fat cop on Heroes. But then again, half the fun is in deciphering meanings hinted at. Add a knowing smile, or a lingering look to add to the intrigue.

There’s a great scene in American Psycho where Bateman’s friends sit about on a table comparing their namecards. Bateman confidently takes out his name card, fresh from his printer, and remarks on the colour and font, confident that his namecard puts him above the rest of his friends. But one by one, they take out namecards more and more tasteful and with subtleties one would never know existed, in an absurd game of one-upmanship, not with cars, but namecards. "how did a bastard like that get so tasteful?" Bateman participates in these social rituals, all the while his mask of sanity is slipping, he is on the edge of frenzy. This is a great example of a positional good. Some things in life are positional, and its absolute value doesn’t matter as much as how much your neighbours have. If you have more money than your neighbors, you feel good. Health is non-positional, Money is. What kind of positional goods do vice-presidents of investment banking firms indulge in? Namecards. This is delightful, and we think it all the more believable because we can identify with the "whose is bigger?" instinct, only this is presented in the context of high society – where vice-presidents play, this is how they do it.

In Decay of an Angel, there’s a scene where Honda instructs Toru on the fine art of conversation. "That’s it, that’s it. That’s the style. And all of a sudden the conversation turns to art…" "You can graduate with the highest marks in your class, but you have to have a sort of vague stupidity that puts people at their ease. Like a kite full of wind." Immediately, I thought of an upper class condescension, rich, evil and manipulative, who tire of money and sport with their words. This is deliciously evil, and it takes a writer with good observation to observe how people behave and put it down in words. Otherwise, do they pluck their ideas entirely from imagination? Probably some seed of a character is at least based on observation. I got this idea from reading Napolean Hill, who presented Antony’s speech in Julius Caesar as an example of Shakespeare being a great psychologist who had an unerring knowledge of the human mind. So then, writers study the human mind? "Foreign table manners may seem a trifle stupid," said Honda, " but when they come in an easy, natural way, they give a person a sense of security. Evidence of good breeding gives a person status…" I began to think of sprezzatura, a term I just came across in The Sartorialist. It just means effortless mastery, but for more details, it was first coined by some Italian (obviously) in a book to describe the ideal behaviour of a courtier, a nonchalance of effortless skill that hides the effort that went into it. It also evokes courtly intrigue, a nice image to have and another reason why its nice to know your etymology.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s